In this paper, I explore some issues in the philosophy of art. I examine a well-known thought experiment about a 20 th century French author who, without copying the words, attempts to write his own version of Don Quixote that would be indistinguishable from Cervantes’ novel to any given reader. I argue that this second Don Quixote is a unique work in its own right, and that this gives us important insights into the nature of artworks, the possibility of forging artworks, and aesthetic evaluation in general. I am currently expanding this paper into an honors thesis on the nature of indistinguishable artworks.
"The Possibility of Forgery,"
Colgate Academic Review:
Vol. 3, Article 9.
Available at: http://commons.colgate.edu/car/vol3/iss1/9